“The value of wind energy resources to our states’ economies cannot be unlocked unless they have access to a market,” said South Dakota Gov. Dennis Daugaard, chairman of the coalition. “Long-distance transmission is the critical link between these resources and the customers who want clean and less-expensive energy.” “Expanding and modernizing the nation’s domestic electrical transmission system, both on shore and off shore, is an essential component in revitalizing the nation’s economy and creating jobs,” said Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, former chairman of the coalition.
In a meeting on Friday, February 21, South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard, Washington Governor Jay Inslee, and Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber — the chairman, vice chairman and past chairman of the Governors’ Wind Energy Coalition — and Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioners, discussed a wide range of topics, including transmission development, grid modernization, regional cooperation, coordinated regional operations, and ways in which the Commissioners and the governors can work together to promote the more rapid deployment of wind energy in the United States.
This week, the Supreme Court declined to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s approval of a cost allocation system for new transmission lines for renewable sources in the Midwest. How will this move by the court influence the debate over cost allocation in Midwestern states? During today’s OnPoint, Howard Learner, executive director of the Environmental Law and Policy Center, discusses challenges to modernizing the nation’s transmission system and talks about Midwestern states’ varied approaches to addressing distributed generation and net metering.
A bill revamping Oregon’s renewable energy mandates — and protecting them from a potentially devastating ballot measure — passed unanimously through the state Senate’s Business and Transportation Committee on Tuesday despite criticism from independent utilities and other opponents. Oregon’s renewable energy mandates require large utilities to draw 25 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2025 with a lower percentage required for smaller utilities. But the mandates came under fire recently from smaller utilities worried they would get forced out, lacking the funds to build the renewable power sources necessary to satisfy the mandate.
The proposed Cape Wind offshore wind farm in Massachusetts’ Nantucket Sound moved another step toward realization yesterday, announcing that it has received approval for a significant chunk of financial backing needed for construction of the project, which is estimated at $2.6 billion. In a speech to Offshore Wind Power USA conference attendees, Cape Wind President Jim Gordon yesterday said the initiative has received a $600 million loan from EKF, Denmark’s official export credit agency.
In a panel discussion held here yesterday, high natural gas costs spurred by the Northeast’s frigid winter emerged as a point of hope for the kingpins of the offshore wind energy industry. Jim Gordon, president of the long-delayed Cape Wind project and a former natural gas developer himself, opened his remarks at the Offshore Wind Power USA conference noting that the price of natural gas in New England that morning was $29.75 per million British thermal units, while the price of electricity was $237 per megawatt-hour. “Contrast that to Cape Wind’s power. If it was up and running today, [it] would be $190 per megawatt-hour,” Gordon said.
Saying the state needs a long-term energy plan, Democrats in the state Legislature are proposing to expand utilities’ use of renewable energy to supply power to their customers. The bill being unveiled this week would increase the state’s renewable energy target to 30% by 2030. Wisconsin utilities have already complied with the 2015 mandate, which requires that 10% of the state’s electricity come from renewable sources that year.
Getting American businesses to support action on climate change is the key to prompting congressional movement, financial investor turned billionaire activist Tom Steyer told a group here yesterday. Businesses need to see how not acting on climate will affect their bottom line, Steyer said as he spoke at the Climate Leadership Conference. As well, he said, there are opportunities to make money by developing technological and other solutions to climate-related problems.
It’s physics 101: A wind turbine spins by extracting energy from moving air. As a turbine moves faster, the wind powering the twirling blades slows down a little bit. But what happens when turbines are hit with the high-speed winds that power hurricanes like Sandy or Katrina? Could an offshore wind farm actually dampen the destructive force of a superstorm?
Though energy security and economic competitiveness are important benefits, officials speaking yesterday at the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Summit outside Washington, D.C., said slowing climate change is the primary driver for energy research and innovation. “I’ve certainly not shied away from emphasizing the role of climate” in driving policy, said Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz. “The big questions [around legislation], then, are what, how much and when.”