The British government has approved construction of two adjacent wind farm projects off the northeast Scottish coast that combined will create the third-largest offshore wind farm in the world, creating 5,000 jobs and generating enough electricity to power a million homes. The projects proposed by Moray Offshore Renewables Ltd. and Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Ltd. will have a maximum generating capacity of 1,866 megawatts from 326 wind turbines. The wind farms could be worth up to £2.5 billion ($4.1 billion) over their lifetime, according to Scottish Energy Minister Fergus Ewing.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today unveiled a series of proposals to better align the country’s increasingly gas-dependent electric grid with an expanding pipeline complex, a move aimed at preventing gas outages and rolling blackouts that have hit the Southwest in past years. FERC’s proposed rulemaking detailed changes to the natural gas industry’s trading day and nomination schedule, which the agency said would make the system more flexible and ensure gas is available for all parties at critical times.
If a wind turbine pops up in your backyard — even if you live in a booming urban area — it won’t affect the value of your home that much, a new report has found. The study, supported by the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center, did indicate a small impact on home prices during the period between when a turbine project is announced and when it is constructed. But during a webinar yesterday hosted by the Department of Energy, the authors say this value was statistically insignificant. “Our results do not support the claim that wind turbines affect nearby home prices, and what we were quite confident about is that the study did find effects from a variety of negative features as well as positive features,” said Carol Atkinson-Palombo, assistant professor at the University of Connecticut’s Department of Geography.
After leaving his post as deputy director of the White House Council on Environmental Quality earlier this year, how is Gary Guzy now advising industry clients to prepare for the Obama administration’s air regulations? During today’s OnPoint, Guzy, senior of counsel at Covington & Burling, gives his take on the current state of play on regulation and the possibility for litigation resulting from U.S. EPA’s New Source Performance Standards. Guzy also discusses the impact White House counselor John Podesta is having on the administration’s climate narrative.
If U.S. EPA proposes a tough carbon standard for existing power plants, it won’t risk sacrificing energy affordability or reliability, a prominent environmental group said today. The Natural Resources Defense Council released a new analysis of its 2012 report on how EPA could use the Clean Air Act’s Section 111(d) to rein in emissions from today’s power plant fleet. It argued that there are ample opportunities for efficiency and low-carbon energy to allow states to satisfy even very stringent reduction targets.
President Obama has packed cash for state air regulators in his U.S. EPA budget proposal, pointing to a leading role for states in shaping rules for curbing greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants. The fiscal 2015 proposal would provide $24.3 million to help states prepare for the climate rule — offering $19.8 million in Clean Air Act grants for writing implementation plans and $4.5 million for greenhouse gas permitting, including the collection of emissions data.
Federal judges wrestled today with a series of complex challenges to a major Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order aimed at increasing regional coordination in transmission grid planning. More than 20 state regulators, utilities and industry groups are seeking to undermine aspects of FERC’s 2011 Order 1000, one of the commission’s largest and most controversial rules. The order seeks to change the way transmission line projects are planned across the country. FERC says the current lack of coordination will lead to unnecessary costs that will translate into electricity rates that are unjust and unreasonable.
The wind industry has gone to great lengths over the years to snap up the best properties for its farms, often looking to remote swaths of prairie or distant mountain ridges to maximize energy production and minimize community opposition. Now, it is reaching for the sky.
Absent government subsidies or a carbon tax, it may take more than a decade for renewable energy from wind and solar to become cost competitive with cheap natural gas. Despite years of steady, sometimes precipitous cost declines, the price of renewable power still hovers well above market prices. Nevertheless, some companies are making long-term bets on green power. Looking for a hedge against the volatile price swings of fossil fuels, they are turning to a new kind of contract, called a virtual power purchase agreement (VPPA), to lock in power prices for decades to come.
It is Germany’s national goal: to have the bulk of its energy supplied by renewable power sources by 2050, without endangering the country’s powerful industrial sector or an export-based economy that is the envy of other Europeans. This energy push, known as the Energiewende, or energy transformation, took on new urgency with the decision to speed up the phasing out of nuclear power after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. But the question of whether Germany can meet its 2050 goal has been hotly debated. And the issue has taken on added importance with the Russia-Ukraine crisis threatening Germany’s largest single source of natural gas.